Tasmanian Government Logo

Sentencing Advisory Council

Sentencing Advisory Council projects

Current projects

Review of section 11B of the Sentencing Act 1997

In early 2023 the Attorney-General requested the Sentencing Advisory Council consider the operation of section 11B of the Sentencing Act 1997.

Section 11B was added to the Sentencing Act in 2017 and provides that when determining the appropriate sentence for an offender, the court is to take into account any hatred for or prejudice against any victim of the offence, person or group of persons associated with the victim, based on racial grounds.  This is to be taken into account by the court as an aggravating circumstance in relation to the offence.

The terms of reference for this project are to:

  1. Examine the current scope of section 11B of the Sentencing Act 1997 and the use of this provision by courts in Tasmania to date.
  2. Undertake a comparative analysis of relevant provisions of sentencing legislation in other Australian jurisdictions.
  3. Examine whether section 11B could be expanded to consider whether the offence was motivated to any degree by religion, language, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, innate variations of sex characteristics, age, a particular physical disability or cognitive impairment, or a mental illness.  Alternatively, whether comparative amendments could be made elsewhere in the Sentencing Act 1997 with a consideration of the benefits and challenges of such inclusions.
  4. Provide advice as to whether amendment should be made to section 11B, or any other part of the Sentencing Act 1997, to extend the provisions of section 11B to other motives.

Research for this project commenced on 17 April 2023.

Consultation has closed

The consultation period for public feedback and comment on the review of section 11B of the Sentencing Act 1997 has closed.

Thank you to those stakeholders and interested persons who attended the Council’s Public Forum on 7 September 2023, and those who have provided a response to the Consultation Paper.

The Council is now considering the responses to assist it to formulate its advice to the Attorney-General.

Consultation paper

The consultation paper, which has information on the provision and how it currently operates, is still available below for interest and information purposes only.  Submissions are no longer able to be received.

Download document

Consultation Paper - Motivation of Prejudice or Hatred as an Aggravating Factor in Sentencing
(PDF, 827.5 KB)


Information Guides to Sentencing in Tasmania

A guide and two shorter information resources on the sentencing process in Tasmania for use by members of the public, victims of crime, offenders, Community Legal Centres and the courts have been developed and are freely available to anyone interested.

The information resources are:

  1. A Guide to Sentencing booklet is a detailed resource which describes how Tasmanian courts sentence offenders – people who have been found guilty of an offence.  It will be a useful resource to explain what’s going on in court, as well as for students, teachers, and anyone wishing to learn about the sentencing process in Tasmania.
  2. A4 information sheet: How courts sentence adult offenders - is a simplified guide to take people through the sentencing process for adult offenders.  It is written for court users themselves (suspects, offenders, witnesses, victims and families) and formatted so that it can be easily printed off and given to people to take away to read or refer to at any stage, or left for display.
  3. A4 information sheet: How courts sentence young offenders is a simplified guide to take people through the sentencing process for young offenders in the Tasmanian Magistrates Court (Youth Justice Division). It is written for a broad audience – not just young people – so it still contains quite a lot of information and some legal terminology.

The development of an additional resource has been added to this project.  An easy read guide specifically written for young people experiencing the youth justice process for the first time is in development. The Easy read guide: How the Youth Court could sentence you should be ready for consultation towards the end of 2023.

The first three information resources are now available for download below.

Download documents

A Guide to Sentencing in Tasmania 2020 (PDF, 345.9 KB)

How Courts Sentence Adult Offenders (PDF, 228.2 KB)

How Courts Sentence Young Offenders  (PDF, 225.8 KB)

Printed copies of the information sheet on how courts sentence adult offenders are also available free of charge by sending a request to sac@justice.tas.gov.au


Past projects

Suspended Sentences – Review

The Sentencing Advisory Council has completed its review of the use of suspended sentences, drug treatment orders, and the new sentencing orders of Home Detention Order and Community Corrections Order.

On 17 November 2021 the Council forwarded the final report to the Attorney-General.  The Attorney-General tabled the report in both Houses of Parliament on 25 November 2021, as required under the provisions of the Sentencing Amendment (Phasing Out Of Suspended Sentences) Act 2017.

Download document

Review under Section 2 of the Sentencing Amendment (Phasing Out Of Suspended Sentences) Act 2017 (PDF, 3.2 MB)

Background

The Sentencing Amendment (Phasing Out Of Suspended Sentences) Act 2017 commenced on 14 December 2018.

This Act established two new sentencing orders - Home Detention Orders (HDO) and Community Correction Orders (CCO). The provisions for HDOs and CCOs commenced on 14 December 2018.

The Act also contained provisions to limit the ability to suspend sentences for some offences.  However, these provisions may not commence until a review has been conducted by the Sentencing Advisory Council following the commencement of the new sentencing orders.

As required under the Sentencing Amendment (Phasing Out Of Suspended Sentences) Act 2017, terms of reference for the review were tabled in both Houses of Parliament and were subsequently approved on 10 and 11 November 2020.

On 20 November 2020 the Attorney-General gave notice to the Sentencing Advisory Council to conduct the review under the following approved terms of reference:

Home Detention under Part 5A of the Sentencing Act 1997:

  1. How many home detention orders have been made by the court, and for what offences?
  2. What is the average duration of a home detention order?
  3. With respect to 2, how does this compare to suspended sentencing orders for similar offending?
  4. Have any breaches been committed by offenders while serving a home detention order that have resulted in an application to court to have the order varied or cancelled?
  5. If the answer to 4 is yes, what was the outcome(s)?
  6. With respect to 5, how does this compare to breaches committed by offenders serving a suspended sentence for similar offending?
  7. What has been the perceived effectiveness of home detention as a sentencing option among relevant stakeholders?
  8. Are any legislative amendments recommended that could be made to improve the operation of home detention, particularly if suspended sentences are phased out?

Community Correction Orders under Part 5B of the Sentencing Act 1997:

  1. How many community correction orders have been made by the court, and for what offences?
  2. What is the average duration of a community correction order?
  3. With respect to 10, how does this compare to a suspended sentence for similar offending?
  4. Have any breaches been committed by offenders while serving a community correction order that have resulted in an application to court to have the order varied or cancelled?
  5. If the answer to 12 is yes, what was the outcome(s)?
  6. With respect to 13, how does this compare to breaches committed by offenders serving a suspended sentence for similar offending?
  7. What has been the perceived effectiveness of community correction orders as a sentencing option among agency stakeholders?
  8. Are any legislative amendments recommended that could be made to improve the operation of community correction orders, particularly if suspended sentences are phased out?

Court Mandated Drug Diversion (CMD) – Drug Treatment Orders under Part 3A of the Sentencing Act 1997:

  1. How many drug treatment orders have been made by the Supreme Court, and for what offences?
  2. What is the average duration of a drug treatment order?
  3. Should a court be able to extend the term of a drug treatment order, and if so, are there any limitations or conditions that should apply, e.g., a limit on the time for which a drug treatment order can be extended, that a drug treatment order can only be extended to allow for completion of a treatment program?
  4. With respect to 18, how does this compare to a suspended sentence for similar offending?
  5. Have any breaches been committed by offenders while serving a drug treatment order that have resulted in an application to court to have the order varied or cancelled?
  6. If the answer to 21 is yes, what was the outcome(s)?
  7. With respect to 22, how does this compare to breaches committed by offenders serving a suspended sentence for similar offending?
  8. What has been the perceived effectiveness of the extension to the Supreme Court of drug treatment orders as a sentencing option among agency stakeholders?
  9. Are any legislative amendments recommended that could be made to improve the operation of drug treatment orders, particularly if suspended sentences are phased out?

Phasing out of Suspended Sentences:

  1. How many and how often are suspended sentence orders made for offences listed in Schedule 3 of the Sentencing Amendment (Phasing out of Suspended Sentences) Act 2017?
  2. With reference to 26, for each offence, has the number of suspended sentence orders made declined since the commencement (in 2014) of the Government’s project to phase out suspended sentences?
  3. With reference to 26, are any offences listed in Schedule 3 incompatible with either drug treatment, home detention or community correction orders as a substitute sentencing option, in place of a suspended sentence?
  4. Any other matters considered relevant.

The Council is to regard any reference to ‘agency stakeholders’ in terms 15 and 24 to be equivalent to ‘relevant stakeholders’.

Work on this project commenced in April 2021.

The Council released a consultation paper in August 2021 to assist its review.  The paper provides information about the use and duration of the sentencing options, including the use of suspended sentences for specified offences.  The consultation period closed on 13 September 2021 and the Council incorporated the feedback received into its final report.

The paper is still available below for interest.

Download document

Consultation Paper: Review under Section 2 of the Sentencing Amendment (Phasing Out Of Suspended Sentences) Act 2017 (PDF, 2.6 MB)


Sentencing young offenders

The Sentencing Advisory Council released Research Paper 6: Sentencing Young Offenders on 10 November 2021.

This Paper provides information on the operation of the Magistrates Court (Youth Justice Division) and the sentencing of young offenders by the Supreme Court.  The Paper also examines the use of pre-court diversion (cautions and community conferences) as this is integral to the Tasmanian approach to youth justice.

Sentencing of young offenders occurs under the Tasmanian Youth Justices Act 1997.  Previously the Sentencing Advisory Council’s consideration of sentencing has only examined sentencing under the Sentencing Act 1997.  This research paper will fill the gap in public information around the operation of the sentencing principles, options and practices under the Youth Justices Act.

The Paper is not a review of the youth justice system in Tasmania, and does not contain any recommendations.  Instead it is focused on providing information about the operation of youth justice sentencing, which will provide an information resource for anyone involved in the youth justice area.

Download document

Research Paper 6: Sentencing Young Offenders (PDF, 2.6 MB)


Sentencing for Non-Fatal Strangulation

The Sentencing Advisory Council released Research Paper 5: Sentencing for Non-Fatal Strangulation on 17 June 2021.  This paper examines the nature and consequences of non-fatal strangulation, choking and suffocation, and demonstrates the inherent risk and seriousness of the conduct, as well as its role in the maintenance of control and fear in family violence contexts.

The paper details the offences that may be charged in Tasmania in circumstances of non-fatal strangulation, choking or suffocation, and information on sentencing in the Supreme Court.  Information on sentencing for strangulation offences in selected other comparable jurisdictions is included.

Based on its research, the Council makes three suggestions for reform:

Suggestion 1:

Amend the Sentencing Act 1997 (Tas) to provide that strangulation and suffocation are aggravating circumstances in relation to an offence.

Suggestion 2:

Amend section 13A of the Family Violence Act 2004 (Tas) to provide for the recording of non-fatal strangulation as a particular of a family violence offence on a person’s criminal record.

Suggestion 3:

Amend the Sentencing Act 1997 (Tas) to provide for the recording of non-fatal strangulation as a particular of the offence on a person’s criminal record in cases other than family violence cases.

Download document

Research Paper No. 5: Sentencing for Non-Fatal Strangulation (PDF, 1.6 MB)


Sentencing appeals in Tasmania

The Sentencing Advisory Council released Research Paper 4: Sentencing Appeals in Tasmania on 27 August 2019.  This Research Paper provides information about the operation of appeals against sentence for offenders sentenced under the Sentencing Act 1997 in Tasmania.

The Research Paper provides an overview of the appeal framework in Tasmania applicable to appeals against sentence for Supreme Court and Magistrates Court matters.  It looks at appeals against sentence from both decisions of magistrates in the Magistrates Court to the Supreme Court (motions to review) and decisions of single judges in the Supreme Court to the Court of Criminal Appeal (appeals) over a specified period of years.

The Paper makes key findings in relation to:

  • The proportion of cases sentenced in the Supreme Court and Magistrates Court resulting in an appeal against sentence
  • The proportion of appeals initiated by the offender or the Crown
  • The proportion of appeals against sentence that were allowed or dismissed
  • The grounds of appeal
  • The offence types most likely to be involved in a sentence appeal
  • Change to the original sentence after a successful appeal; and
  • Legal representation.

The paper also compares the success rate for appeals against sentence in Tasmania with those in NSW and Victoria.

Download document

Research Paper No. 4: Sentencing Appeals in Tasmania (PDF, 845.6 KB)


Sentencing for serious sex offences against children

The Sentencing Advisory Council released Research Paper 3: Sentencing for Serious Sex Offences against Children on 19 December 2018.  This Research Paper examines trends in sentencing in Tasmania for serious sex offences against children.

The sentencing data for serious child sex offences for the period 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2018 was examined in comparison with sentencing data for the period 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. The data for the 2008-14 period had been collected earlier as part of the research for the Council’s reports Sex Offence Sentencing: Final Report No. 4 and Mandatory Sentencing for Serious Sex Offences against Children: Final Report No. 7.  This Paper builds on that research and provides an update on sentencing for serious sex offences against children during the 2015-18 period.

The Council identified a decided upward trend in the sentences imposed under the Sentencing Act 1997 in the later period.  The Council makes a number of key findings and observations in relation to the decisions of the Court of Criminal Appeal when considering sentencing for sexual offences, and the trends emerging from the data for sentencing in the Supreme Court for sexual offences involving children.  As this is a Research Paper the Council does not make any recommendations.

Download document

Research Paper No. 3: Sentencing for Serious Sex Offences against Children (PDF, 737.9 KB)


Statutory sentencing discounts for pleas of guilty

In August 2017 the Acting Attorney-General, the Hon Matthew Groom, requested the Sentencing Advisory Council examine and report on a statutory sentencing discount for pleas of guilty in Tasmania.  This was a response to concerns in relation to delays in criminal proceedings and late-resolving guilty pleas, in particular the significant impact on the efficiency of the administration of justice and the court system and the unnecessary additional stress and trauma for victims, their families and other vulnerable participants in the criminal trial process.

The Council commenced research on this referral in January 2018.

The Council released a consultation paper in April 2018 which provides an overview of the current approach taken to the reduction of sentence for a guilty plea in Tasmania, and examines legislative approaches in other Australian jurisdictions and comparable international jurisdictions.  The Council also held a forum and individual meetings with key stakeholders to inform the final stage of its work.

The Council released its Final Report No. 10: Statutory Sentencing Reductions for Pleas of Guilty on 7 November 2018.

Download documents

Statutory Sentencing Discounts for Pleas of Guilty: Consultation Paper (PDF, 1.6 MB)

Final Report No. 10: Statutory Sentencing Reductions for Pleas of Guilty (PDF, 2.2 MB)

Any queries may be directed to the Council at mailto:sac@justice.tas.gov.au


Mandatory treatment for sex offenders

Mandatory treatment for alcohol and drug affected offenders

In March 2015 the Attorney-General requested the Sentencing Advisory Council examine putting into effect compulsory sex offender treatment programs in prison.

In late 2015 the Attorney-General requested the Council expand the terms of reference for the mandatory treatment for sex offenders project to include consideration of mandatory treatment for drug and alcohol offenders, and to consider programs both in prison and in the community.  The Council divided this project into 2 stages:

  • Stage 1 – Mandatory treatment of adult offenders in prison and in the community for those convicted of sex offences.
  • Stage 2 – Mandatory treatment of adult offenders in prison and in the community for those convicted of drug and alcohol offences.

The Council has completed Stage 1 and released Research Paper No. 1: Mandatory Treatment for Sex Offenders on 16 February 2017.

The Council has completed Stage 2 and released Research Paper No. 2: Mandatory Treatment for Alcohol and Drug Affected Offenders on 21 December 2017.

Download documents

Research Paper No. 1: Mandatory Treatment for Sex Offenders (PDF, 693.1 KB)

Research Paper No. 2: Mandatory Treatment for Alcohol and Drug Affected Offenders (PDF, 618.0 KB)


Dangerous driving causing death

In October 2015 the Attorney-General requested the Sentencing Advisory Council examine and provide a report on sentencing in relation to driving offences that result in the death or injury of another. Work on this referral commenced in June 2016.

The Council released a Consultation Paper on 22 October 2016 which provides an overview of the existing sentencing framework in Tasmania and information on sentencing patterns for driving offences where death or injury was caused, both in Tasmania and in other jurisdictions. The paper sought feedback on 20 areas in particular through a series of questions around sentencing and possible reform options.  The consultation period closed on 18 November 2016.

The Council also conducted a series of forums and individual meetings with key stakeholders in November 2016.

The Council released its Final Report No. 8: Sentencing of Driving Offences that Result in Death or Injury on 26 April 2017.

Download documents

Consultation Paper: Sentencing of Driving Offences that Result in Death or Injury (PDF, 2.9 MB)

Final Report No. 8: Sentencing of Driving Offences that Result in Death or Injury (PDF, 1.5 MB)


Mandatory sentencing for serious sex offences

In October 2015 the Attorney-General requested the Sentencing Advisory Council undertake a separate project to investigate the implementation of minimum mandatory sentencing for serious sexual offences against children, and examine Tasmania’s current legislative framework for sentencing sex offenders.  The Council was also asked to provide preliminary advice on the legislative means required to implement such a scheme and provide advice as to what mandatory minimum sentences for serious sexual offences should be and which offences should be captured within the scope of the mandatory sentencing provisions.

In April 2016 the Council undertook targeted consultation with key stakeholders to test Council’s preliminary views and obtain feedback in relation to the implementation of minimum mandatory sentencing for those who commit serious sexual offences against children.

The Final Report No. 7: Mandatory Sentencing for Serious Sex Offences against Children was released in November 2016.

Part A of the report reiterates Council’s recommendation from their earlier Sex Offence Sentencing report that mandatory sentencing not be introduced in Tasmania.  It also sets out some objections to the implementation of a mandatory minimum sentencing scheme in Tasmania.

Part B discusses the implementation of such a scheme. The Council provides preliminary advice on:

  • Which offences should be included in the scheme;
  • The structure of such a scheme;
  • Exceptions to a mandatory minimum sentencing scheme; and
  • The levels of the mandatory minimum sentences.

Download document

Final Report No. 7: Mandatory Sentencing for Serious Sex Offences against Children (PDF, 1.2 MB)


Phasing out suspended sentences

The Sentencing Advisory Council received a reference from the Attorney-General in July 2014 to examine Tasmania’s current use of suspended sentences and how to phase out suspended sentences in Tasmania.

As part of this project the Council conducted a period of public consultation during August/September 2015. A Consultation Paper setting out Council’s preliminary views and draft recommendations, and companion Background Paper containing background information, were released to assist the public to provide comment.  

The Council also commissioned a specialist report to assist in examining the cost of alternative sentencing options. The separate economic modelling report 'Exploring the Costs of Alternatives to Suspended Sentences' in Tasmania was released to the public together with the final report.

The Council released its Final Report No. 6: Phasing out of Suspended Sentencesin March 2016. The report examines how to phase out suspended sentences in Tasmania and makes 55 recommendations in relation to this area. The recommendations cover:

  • Transitional arrangements for phasing out suspended sentences;
  • Expanding Court Mandated Diversion to cover alcohol and drug treatment orders;
  • Status of replacement intermediate sanctions;
  • Non-introduction of periodic detention or community detention orders, or intensive correction/supervision orders;
  • Introduction of home detention;
  • Introduction of new community correction order (CCO);
  • Replacement of partly suspended sentences with combined imprisonment and CCO’s, but not use parole system for this purpose; and
  • Availability and use of deferred sentencing.

Download documents

Background paper: Phasing out of Suspended Sentences (PDF, 1.2 MB)

Consultation Paper: Phasing out of Suspended Sentences (PDF, 1.3 MB)

Exploring the Costs of Alternatives to Suspended Sentences in Tasmania (DOCX, 1.7 MB)

Final Report No. 6: Phasing out of Suspended Sentences (PDF, 4.7 MB)


Family violence sentencing

In October 2013 the Attorney-General requested the Sentencing Advisory Council provide advice on sentencing of adult family violence offenders in Tasmania, following the identification of a number of problems relating to the sentencing of family violence offenders in a series of reports presented to the Government of the day.

The Sentencing Advisory Council released its Final Report No. 5: Sentencing of Adult Family Violence Offendersin December 2015.  This report provides advice on the sentencing of adult family violence offenders in Tasmania and includes consideration of the range and adequacy of sentencing options and support programs currently available, and the role of specialist family violence lists or courts in dealing with family violence matters.  

The Council was not asked to provide recommendations and so the report offers 12 observations about current sentencing practices for these offences.

Download document

Final Report No. 5: Sentencing of Adult Family Violence Offenders (PDF, 973.9 KB)


Sex offence sentencing

In May 2012 the Attorney-General sought advice from the Sentencing Advisory Council in relation to the sentencing of sex offences in Tasmania.

As part of this project, during May 2013 the Council invited the public to express their views on the appropriateness of present sentencing practices for sex offences in Tasmania, and what changes could be made to the legal system to address any practices considered not appropriate.  To assist the public the Council released a detailed Research Paper to provide background information and analysis of sentencing practices in Tasmania and other jurisdictions for these offences, as well as a Consultation Paper which highlighted some issues for consideration and response by the public.  A public forum was also conducted for any interested parties to attend.

The Sentencing Advisory Council released its Final Report No. 4: Sentencing of Sex Offenders in September 2015.  This Report provides information on existing sentencing practices in the Tasmanian Supreme Court regarding sex offences and advice on how to address any inadequacies. The report makes 15 recommendations regarding these areas.

Download documents

The Research Paper and Consultation Paper are directly linked to the LINC Tasmania website where they have been deposited.

Research Paper: Sex Offence Sentencing

Consultation Paper: Sex Offence Sentencing

Final Report No. 4: Sentencing of Sex Offenders (PDF, 1.9 MB)


Sentencing database

The project to establish a searchable online database for sentencing data from the Tasmanian courts has been completed for criminal cases in the Magistrates Court.

The database was launched in July 2015 and can be found at SAC Stats.


Non-conviction sentences

In October 2013 the Sentencing Advisory Council was asked by the Attorney-General to provide advice on the implications for an offender where a court does not record a conviction following a finding of guilt, and specifically whether a fine should be imposed if a conviction is not recorded.

The Council released its Final Report No. 3: Non-Conviction Sentences ‘Not recording a conviction as a sentencing option’ in August 2014, which contains 36 recommendations to the Attorney-General based on its research and findings. The recommendations address areas such as:

  • continuing non-conviction orders as a sentencing option;
  • restrictions on the disclosure of findings of guilt without a conviction and exemptions to the restrictions;
  • how to implement the imposition of greater restrictions and consequences from this;
  • penalty provisions for subsequent offending;
  • consistency in Tasmanian legislation with the modern understanding of conviction; and
  • imposing a fine where no conviction is recorded.

Download document

Final Report No. 3: Non-Conviction Sentences ‘Not recording a conviction as a sentencing option’ (PDF, 1.3 MB)


Assaults on emergency workers

This project was one of the initial referrals to the Sentencing Advisory Council at its inception in June 2010. The Attorney-General requested Council to provide advice in relation to assaults on emergency workers in Tasmania.

In June 2012 Council released a Consultation Paper to assist in the discussion about the capacity of Tasmania’s sentencing structure to deal with the sentencing of persons found guilty of assaults on emergency service workers in Tasmania. The Paper:

  • Reviewed the legislative provisions in Tasmania and other jurisdictions applying to assaults on emergency workers;
  • Examined the adequacy of existing laws and sentencing practices in Tasmania; and
  • Considered proposals for additional and/or new penalties and legislative provisions.

The Final Report No. 2: Assaults on Emergency Service Workers was released in March 2013. Based on the evidence from research and the submissions received to the Consultation Paper, the final advice to the Attorney General contains one recommendation proposing various changes to the Police Offences Act 1935 and a definition of an emergency service worker.

Download documents

Consultation Paper: Assaults on Emergency Service Workers

Final Report No. 2: Assaults on Emergency Service Workers (PDF, 439.4 KB)


Arson and deliberately lit fires

This project was one of the initial referrals by the Attorney-General to the Sentencing Advisory Council at its inception in June 2010. The Council was asked to provide advice into offences and sentencing for arson and deliberately lit fires in Tasmania, including consideration of community information, education and post-sentencing programmes.

The Council released a Consultation Paper in December 2011 to assist in the discussion around the legislative framework, sentencing options and related matters in relation to adults and juveniles involved in fire setting. The Paper:

  • Reviewed the current legislative framework and sentencing options for adult and juvenile offenders, both in Tasmania and other jurisdictions;
  • Considered the recommendations made by the Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and similar forums;
  • Examined existing and new criminal provisions;
  • Considered treatment programmes for adult and juvenile offenders; and
  • Considered community information and education programmes.

The Final Report No. 1: Arson and Deliberately Lit Fires was released in December 2012 and uses the research in the Consultation Paper to provide background information relating to both bushfire and property arson. The report makes 13 recommendations covering:

  • the legislative offence framework;
  • the sentencing framework in Tasmania for adults and for juveniles;
  • treatment programmes for adults;
  • education and treatment programmes for juveniles; and
  • community information and education programmes.

Download documents

Consultation Paper: Arson and Deliberately Lit Fires

Final Report No. 1: Arson and Deliberately Lit Fires (PDF, 386.5 KB)



PDFs require a PDF reader to be viewed. Follow this link to download a PDF reader or contact us if you would like to request the publication in an alternative format.